Not 100% sure if conversions are correct.
Are they?
Code:
AND:
IF a AND b THEN
c
END IF
------
IF "a" THEN
IF "b" THEN
c
END IF
END IF
OR:
IF a OR b THEN
c
END IF
------
IF a THEN
c
ELSE
IF b THEN
c
END IF
END IF
XOR:
IF a XOR b THEN
c
END IF
------
IF a THEN
IF NOT b THEN
c
END IF
ELSE
IF b THEN
c
END IF
EQV:
IF a EQV b THEN
c
END IF
------
IF a THEN
IF b THEN
c
END IF
ELSE
IF NOT b THEN
c
END IF
IMP:
IF a IMP b THEN
c
END IF
------
IF a THEN
c
END IF
The transformations upto XOR look good. But I am not sure about the last two.
this is wrong:
Code:
OR:
IF a OR b THEN
c
END IF
------
IF a THEN
c
ELSE
IF b THEN
c
END IF
END IF
It should be:
Code:
IF a THEN c
IF b THEN c
Quote:this is wrong:
Code:
OR:
IF a OR b THEN
c
END IF
------
IF a THEN
c
ELSE
IF b THEN
c
END IF
END IF
It should be:
Code:
IF a THEN c
IF b THEN c
No, what he put is still correct, in that it will execute c when and only when using an OR would. It just is longer than it needs to be.
Nevermind ... too much pot
(in fact, somehow, I was thinking in prolog
)
Actually your code would execute c twice.....
Quote:Actually your code would execute c twice.....
No, the ELSE clause cannot execute if the IF part does.
That's right........
................
Quote:Agamemnus Wrote:Actually your code would execute c twice.....
No, the ELSE clause cannot execute if the IF part does.
He was refering to Na_th_an's code.... :-?
Quote:PlayGGY Wrote:Agamemnus Wrote:Actually your code would execute c twice.....
No, the ELSE clause cannot execute if the IF part does.
He was refering to Na_th_an's code.... :-?
Woops. And he is right.