... if the UN doesn't take care of the political transition in that country. Luckily, our government has changed back to left wing. It is one of the most important things in the new Prime Minister's agenda. Other stuff is about fighting terrorism with the aid of all democratic parties in Spain.
Sounds good. Although once the damage in Iraq is done, don't you think that help is going to be needed everywhere? I mean, make the country that fought have to repair.
The US alone with Britain will take a long time in the reparation process if it doesn't have help.
Quote:I mean, make the country that fought have to repair.
The US alone with Britain will take a long time in the reparation process if it doesn't have help.
what do you mean by that? I dont get it.
Quote:Zack Wrote:I mean, make the country that fought have to repair.
The US alone with Britain will take a long time in the reparation process if it doesn't have help.
what do you mean by that? I dont get it.
Nath said that Spanish soldiers were going to leave Iraq.
I don't necessarily think that's a good thing. I mean, everyone should chip in the rebuilding process of Iraq, especially those who contributed in the war.
Agreed, although the US and Britain should bear most of the cost (especially the US) since they marched into Iraq without the world's appoval.
Of course. Bush should clean up his mess in Iraq, and Afghanistan.
Britain should too. So should all contributers. So should everyone.
britain can't afford it seeing as we are in billions of debt to the americans
Yes I guess after Iraq & the terroist destroyed half of the world with their chemical warefare then America should have been responsable to pay for all the destruction it would have coused then too right after all if america & Britian didn't go to war & oust the sob then don't you think they would have just grew stronger..
Sometimes you have to do what you feels right to protect pepole. not just Americans but the world at large.
Terroist kills everyday then should not we go & fight them. & the countries they hide behind..
Terroist will become the #1 enemy of the world. Why do we want them to go unscaved ? I don't support war either what so ever but isn't it nice to know that once a very powerful threat (Iraqi) is now no threat, & could now help all of us in controlling terroist.
After all were not going to completely get rid of terroist.
Why does it seem that all want to trample the USA's name in rubbish. The US & Britian I feel done their part along with alot of others. Not to many countries decided against the US & Britian.
Of all the countries Britian stood right beside of the US
I have never knew the US to say one bad word to its pepole about Britian. France is another story though. You really have to stand up for what you beleive in.
Then Britain shouldn't have gotten involved in the war. Plain and simple.
Zack wrote
Quote:Then Britain shouldn't have gotten involved in the war. Plain and simple.
Canada was involved also.. I think it's great when countries see that their is a threat out there & they take out this threat.
The biggest problem with Iraq was deciding on how to do it not if it should be done but
HOW IT SHOULD BE DONE