Qbasicnews.com

Full Version: qbcmx compiling slower than compiling from qb.exe
You're currently viewing a stripped down version of our content. View the full version with proper formatting.
i noticed it when i first compiled from qbcmx... the fps was in the high 60's. then i recompiled in qb.exe, and i got high 80's. i really don't know if anyone else found this, but i thought i would put it up, as i found this interesting.
eh...? Can you post your code?
uh... whats Qbcmx?
I really doubt it could be the almighty QBCMX's problem.

QBCMX rocks!

Dark: http://phatcode.net/other/qb4med.zip
Download it, install MED into c:\med\, run the QBCMX installer, press ESC during the search, and type in "c:\med\", and press ENTER. Then read the QBCMX docs. Enjoy.
QBCMX doesn't exist.


.
.
.



It's QBMCX: QB MetaCommand Extender.

AND: QBMCX uses QB's own BC and LINK to generate EXEs, so it won't be QBMCX that slows down your program. (Unless you've applied one metacommand that slows down your program) Smile