v1c, when I tried specifying an alternate entry-point in my fb module, fbc told me it couldn't find it. Is it telling my this because it requires some undocumented aruguements?
Gimmie an example, pls.
The -entry option will only work if you have defined a label in ASM or C or a different language, it won't change the name of the entry-point, it will pass to LD a different one than the default.
So I can stick a bit of inline asm in to mark a label?
ie:
Code:
'' stuff up here
Sub MyEntryPoint ()
Asm
asmMyEntryPoint:
End Asm
'' Stuff to do
End Sub
'' More stuff here
And compile using -entry asmMyEntryPoint?
Declaring as a proc will be enough:
Code:
sub foo cdecl alias "foo"
print "no std entry-point called!"
end 0
end sub
Code:
fbc test.bas -entry _foo
END() has to be explicitly called or the proc would return to nowhere..
Yeah, I always end my programs with END anyway.
But, I didn't think of the underscore requirement.
Damn you and your not adding that inherently!
This:
Code:
fbc test.bas -entry foo
would be more basic... :wink: