Qbasicnews.com

I'm curious, so please answer.

I do, but I use FreeBasic, too (don't we all )

Since I'm on either XP or Ubuntu nowdays, so fB is the most suitable for me.

Quote:Since I'm on either XP or Ubuntu nowdays, so fB is the most suitable for me.

same.


Except win98 not XP.


I have qbasic but I haven't used it in awhile.

I have QB, and use it some when helping some1 with a code that might work lil diff in FB... But as for coding FB 100% now... :wink:

i'm basically 100% fb now

i like doing things that qb doesn't, but fb can do in a snap

Oz~

I tend to prefer making my programs QB-compatible, so I develop using QB and then test in FB. I only encounter minor differences, so it's not really a problem. I'm a pure console programmer right now.

Edit: Forgot to mention that I'm in the process of learning C++ right now.

i only open qb to test qb-only code that someone needs help with, or to look up ascii codes.

fb all the way, baby 8)

I try to make my FB code QB compatible, but I don't even test it with QB anymore.

i ONLY use Quickbasics, mostly QBX, i do not use FB because it has not an IDE for DOS like Quickbasics, few times i use the interpreter Qbasic I.IO