Qbasicnews.com

Full Version: The Fifth and Sixth Dimensions
You're currently viewing a stripped down version of our content. View the full version with proper formatting.
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
I am theorizing that the fifth and sixth dimensions must exist.

The first, second, and third dimensions are well known. Horizontal, vertical, and depth.

The fourth dimension is also well known but not as such: time. Most people think the third dimension ends our physical world, but it doesn't. See, at coordinates X Y Z, an atom exists. However, that is only at one coordinate on plane T (for time). On another coordinate, assuming whatever matter that surrounded X Y Z has moved, the coordinates at X Y Z no longer harbour an atom.

This is probably well-known by scientists, although I never read about it and merely discovered it by thinking many years ago on the subject.

More dimensions are theorized to exist, in order to prove other theories such as the common Big Bang theory (not regarding the human reproductive system). However none of these dimensions have been thought to exist in the physical world we see every day.

Well I theorize that a fifth and a sixth dimension do exist in a way we can see every day:

If X is horizontal and Y is vertical and Z is depth, and T is chronological time (going horizontal let us assume) then U must be vertical time and A is depth of time.

Assuming T is horizontal time, then we perceive it going either left to right (experiencing time) or right to left (remembering experiences in time). Then U, or vertical time, must be alternate experiences in alternate universes. Meaning you can look at T and U as a grid and pinpoint experiences that would have happened had some other choice been made. For instance, at point one on U (vertical) and points 1 through 10 on T (horizontal), you would have been roller skating. However, on those same points for T but point 2 for U you may have been skateboarding, and on point 3 you may have just decided to stay home, etc.

If U (vertical time) symbolizes possible outcomes for all choices in the universe and T symbolizes the timeline for everything happening inside one point on U, then A (the depth of time) creates a cubical grid in which all possible points in time must happen in every single possible way.

If anyone has studied such schools of thought and can tell me if I am even remotely close to the truth, please let me know.
You could start scientists argueing for days with talk like that!
I've read a bit about string theory and similar stuff, and no-one seems to agree on anything. Your theory is pretty mild compared to some of the wacky stuff i've read from serious scientists.

wikipedia has a bit about dimensions here

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/String_theo...dimensions
times no dimension...Tongue
Quote:times no dimension...Tongue

Like I said to Marcade:

Quote:You are right that if nothing influences the particle from T to T+1 then it will still be there. The point is that T represents time and that a year from now, a particle in the center of my body representing calcium may not be in the same X Y Z because I may be in another town. So yes, T is the fourth dimension. Assume that when dealing with Z, the grid for X and Y repeats infinitely. The same is true for T. When looking at T, you are looking at an infinite amount of XYZ grids ultimately creating an animated three-dimensional cube (the universe within all time).
Quote:
Deleter Wrote:times no dimension...Tongue

Like I said to Marcade:

Quote:You are right that if nothing influences the particle from T to T+1 then it will still be there. The point is that T represents time and that a year from now, a particle in the center of my body representing calcium may not be in the same X Y Z because I may be in another town. So yes, T is the fourth dimension. Assume that when dealing with Z, the grid for X and Y repeats infinitely. The same is true for T. When looking at T, you are looking at an infinite amount of XYZ grids ultimately creating an animated three-dimensional cube (the universe within all time).

You can have an animated 2d image, and it is NOT 3d. so just because crap moves in 3d, doesn't mean that is 4d.
like i said
time is no dimension.
Technically an animated two-dimensional picture such as on a monitor or television IS a three-dimensional image, because the third dimension is time, NOT depth. So I am right.
Time can very well be a dimension. We could be in a 4th dimensional block of space with an inertial force pushing us through the 4th axis, T. However, we perceive this one differently than we do the other 3.
Right. X Y and Z are perceived physically, whereas T is perceived chronologically and through memory, and U and A are perceived through our imagination (although to them, it's very real and WE are in the imagination).
Quote:Technically an animated two-dimensional picture such as on a monitor or television IS a three-dimensional image, because the third dimension is time, NOT depth. So I am right.
wtf are you smoking Tongue
The funny thing is, that if time is the fourth dimension (or any at all)
then we and the world would just exist as a sort of static 4d "shape",
but we still "move" along that fourth axis, with our conciousness,
and movement requires time, so time would still exist...
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7