ЧÑо ÑÑо?
Flarghen blarghen zappity moofles mcfragen blagen dlagen mcklagen blagen markoofle dweeble dabben boogle moppen thparkentabibly kibibyte ofameda! Dlar klarggle markle thafffen oinkadingdong decaspamaheydron?
Répondez à moi, you treasonous snake-biting tree-hugging moss-eating mountain-sucking golden treasure chest of doom!
Ð ÑовеÑÑкой РоÑÑии, авÑÐ¾Ð¼Ð¾Ð±Ð¸Ð»Ñ ÑпÑавлÑÐµÑ Ð²Ð°Ð¼Ð¸!
By the way, does anyone want to help me invent a language?
Sure thing thegrogen.
Smashtic Smeeh smuuuh bakka bakka could mean you are weird man. :lol:
Inventing a language isn't easy. It's easier once you have some kind of a degree in Liturature/Culture/whatever... though. A linguist perhaps?
No, I've invented a language before. And no, what I said above is not any part of it whatsoever. It's just Russian, French, English, and gibberish.
I had my own cipher
Making the new language was too much work. . . _.>->-_.
I've created several languages when I was a child. It's easy. You define rules for conjugation and grammar. Then you start inventing words. When you need a word, you invent it, note it down, and adhere it to your rules. In a while you have a nice dictionary and are able to communicate in your language. Everytime you need a word, you make it up! :lol:
Quote:I've created several languages when I was a child. It's easy. You define rules for conjugation and grammar. Then you start inventing words. When you need a word, you invent it, note it down, and adhere it to your rules. In a while you have a nice dictionary and are able to communicate in your language. Everytime you need a word, you make it up! :lol:
yeah, but your language sound simple and easily crackable. it would be somewhat Latin based. the why Navajo code talkers were such a value to us (America) in wwII. their language developed independently of European-Latin based languages. therefore had no similar underlying grammar structure.
There's no limits on how complex/awkward the grammar you invent is.
In English you use "Subject [aux] [adv] verb [complements]". In Spanish we have a way more complex layout, but it's essentially the same thing. Well, let's go weird.
Imagine that you talk using this phrase structure:
verb [complements] subject [aux] [adv]
Then you can ellaborate a grammar over it. For example, get rid of the subject and embed it in the verb (like in romance languages). Then you can create combinations of verb+adverb to complicate things more.
You can say "I am completely sure".
First reorder/combine: "Bei sure completely"
Now invent words, for example "to be" being "jihnaad". Make your language so you have several kinds of verbs, each one with different way to "combine" with subjects. Let's say, the first kind just sticks the subject to its trail, and the subject is adi, ed, i, ia, adios, aedos, ios (I, you, he, she, we, you, they respectively):
I am: jihnaadi
you are: jihnaed
he is: jihnai
she is: jihnaia
we are: jihnaadios
you are: jihnaedos
they are: jihnaios
Complete can be ümbumbù, and you can decide to form adverbs from adjectives using the "yy" prefix, so "completely" would be yyümbumbù.
Sure is a noun. No restrictions. Let's decide "jok".
So our phrase would translate as: "jihnaadi jok yyümbumbù"
Elaborate on this and you have your language.
Quote:yeah, but your language sound simple and easily crackable.
I don't get this (sorry, I missed it). Why a language should be hard to crack? :???: