+- Qbasicnews.com (http://qbasicnews.com/newforum)
+-- Forum: QbasicNews.Com (http://qbasicnews.com/newforum/forum-3.html)
+--- Forum: Site/Forum Issues (http://qbasicnews.com/newforum/forum-9.html)
+--- Thread: Not to be nitpicky, but... (/thread-3947.html)
Not to be nitpicky, but... - DrV - 05-13-2004
Sites/Forum Issues should possibly be Site/Forum Issues, as there is only one "site" afaik.... just a suggestion.
Not to be nitpicky, but... - oracle - 05-14-2004
I'll change it when I can.
Not to be nitpicky, but... - Z!re - 05-14-2004
Why did you remove speedlemons post?
Who removed it?
*curious*
Not to be nitpicky, but... - oracle - 05-14-2004
You've got mail.
*/curious*
Not to be nitpicky, but... - speedlemon - 05-15-2004
i forgot what i said. can you tell me why too though?
Not to be nitpicky, but... - Zack - 05-15-2004
You said "I hope you aren't losing sleep over this."
I believe Oracle deleted it because it was kinda useless, but perhaps there was another reason.
Not to be nitpicky, but... - speedlemon - 05-15-2004
thanks for reminding me. if thats useless, than this whole thread is useless. or is oracle playing favorites?
Not to be nitpicky, but... - oracle - 05-15-2004
Quote:thanks for reminding me. if thats useless, than this whole thread is useless. or is oracle playing favorites?
Nope. Dr_v just pointed something out. It's not a big problem, true, but your post was completely pointless and just aiming to provoke. I can't delete a thread in site issues just because it seems pointless to you...
Not to be nitpicky, but... - speedlemon - 05-15-2004
i wasnt provoking him. or at least not intentianally. my point is... could this have been solved via pm?
Not to be nitpicky, but... - oracle - 05-15-2004
Yes, you could have PMed me asking why it was deleted
. But you chose not to. I didn't bother to PM you because it was a small issue, though maybe I should have. Anyway, Z!re's PMing me on behalf of you anyway