+- Qbasicnews.com (http://qbasicnews.com/newforum)
+-- Forum: General (http://qbasicnews.com/newforum/forum-6.html)
+--- Forum: General/Misc (http://qbasicnews.com/newforum/forum-18.html)
+--- Thread: Decompiler (/thread-775.html)
Decompiler - whitetiger0990 - 05-04-2003
Is there a QBasic Decompiler? I look in a lot of places (Including Google) and... None... So is there one out there? If so please tell be were to find it. Thanx
(Sigh.) I'm feeling hungry again. - Glenn - 05-05-2003
Hamburgers are starting to sound real good. Utopian things like decompilers are sort of like perpetual motion machines. If they existed, they wouldn't be all that hard to find. The fact that you couldn't find one isn't a coincidence.
(Not to mention the fact that Qbasic doesn't compile programs in the first place. )
Decompiler - toonski84 - 05-05-2003
it's too late, glenn, i converted that hamburger into a cow already
you could always look up bytecodes and write your own, but it would be more confusing than decompiled assembly...
That explains the really ugly thing that just ran through... - Glenn - 05-05-2003
my yard and left something behind for me to step in.
Decompiler - Dav - 05-05-2003
LOL. (And I happened to be eating a hamburger while reading this. Really.)
No, whitetiger0990, there's no program available. Here's microsoft's response to that question:
Code:
Microsoft does not currently offer any product capable of
"decompiling" an object (.OBJ) or executable (.EXE) file back to the
original source code (.BAS). The following are several reasons for
this:
1. No decompiler could exactly reproduce the original source code.
When a program is compiled to an object and linked to produce an
executable, most of the "names" used in the original program are
converted to addresses. This loss of names means that a decompiler
would have to create unique names for all the variables,
procedures, and labels, and these names would not be meaningful in
the context of the program.
Obviously, source language syntax no longer exists in the compiled
object file or executable. It would be very difficult for a
decompiler to interpret the series of machine language instructions
that exist in an object or executable file and decide what the
original source language instruction was.
2. If such a decompiler did exist and was available, anyone could use
it to decompile any executable program produced in the language the
decompiler was designed for.
For instance, if a Microsoft BASIC decompiler existed, anyone with
that decompiler could use it on an executable that you had
produced and from that executable obtain a copy of your source
code. The source code to any program you wrote in Microsoft BASIC
would be available to anyone with the decompiler. Few developers of
commercial software would want to use a language product that could
be deciphered, thus allowing others to obtain their source code.There's some talk from ex-microsoft programmers who swear there was one made for thier private use. I've also seen a Basic decompiler service on a web site which does provide some working BAS code from your exe, but it's a mess and not worth the money asked for the service. I can't remember the url. It's on mindspring...I'll find it .....wait...
- Dav
Decompiler - whitetiger0990 - 05-05-2003
Oh... Well...
Thanx
Great. Now I'm gonna have to stop at a fast food... - Glenn - 05-05-2003
joint on the way to work.
Decompiler - oracle - 05-05-2003
Someone started making a decompiler and put it up at www.qbasic.com. But I have no idea how good it is...
Decompiler - toonski84 - 05-05-2003
yeah -- 4 years ago
Code:
Last files update: 27 Jan 1999man, i wish that guy would just give up his website already. the guy who owns it keeps telling me how it is in his "client"'s best interest to remain the owner of the site as he paid "thousands" for the domain. gimp.
Decompiler - oracle - 05-05-2003
Well... if qbasic.com came free there would be a right royal scrap on who got the name, qbasic is still a very popular name.
You actually know the person who owns the domain???