Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
QB successors
#6
I agree 100% with wildcard, it's all about the IDE.  No language has ever felt as comfortable or easy as QBasic, because their IDEs are not as simple, functional and polished.  The same goes for the structure and formatting of QBasic commands -- arguably, the simplest and most straightforward of any dialect of BASIC.  QB uses simple, real world language, and it's much easier to learn and understand QB code than just about any follow-up language.

This topic would actually make a really good QB Express article.  Anyone interested in writing up something on the subject?
Pete's QB Site: http://www.petesqbsite.com
Reply


Messages In This Thread
QB successors - by wildcard - 09-02-2007, 06:56 PM
Re: QB successors - by Opresion - 09-03-2007, 01:39 PM
Re: QB successors - by MystikShadows - 09-03-2007, 02:43 PM
Re: QB successors - by Mac - 09-05-2007, 12:24 AM
Re: QB successors - by Dav - 09-05-2007, 04:17 AM
Re: QB successors - by Pete - 09-06-2007, 06:27 AM
Re: QB successors - by wildcard - 09-12-2007, 01:04 AM
Re: QB successors - by Deleter - 09-12-2007, 04:05 AM
Re: QB successors - by wildcard - 09-12-2007, 06:25 PM
Re: QB successors - by SMC - 09-14-2007, 02:32 PM
Re: QB successors - by Dav - 09-14-2007, 11:57 PM
Re: QB successors - by Dr_Davenstein - 09-15-2007, 06:38 AM
Re: QB successors - by SMC - 09-16-2007, 07:41 AM
Re: QB successors - by Dav - 09-16-2007, 05:12 PM
Re: QB successors - by SMC - 09-16-2007, 10:38 PM
Re: QB successors - by stylin - 09-20-2007, 12:08 AM
Re: QB successors - by Kevin_theprogrammer - 12-02-2007, 10:20 AM
Re: QB successors - by Dav - 12-05-2007, 09:31 PM
Re: QB successors - by anarky - 12-06-2007, 06:48 PM
Re: QB successors - by LPG - 04-14-2008, 11:38 AM
Re: QB successors - by Dav - 04-18-2008, 05:30 AM
Re: QB successors - by wildcard - 04-22-2008, 04:01 AM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)