Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
QB successors
#7
Mac: Pete and Dav understand what I mean, when I said QB successor. I've not had as much fun messing around in any programming language/environment as I've had with QB. I think the combination of the IDE and the easy access of the language really made it for me.

I think interpreters/compilers for BASIC really need an easy language set up and importantly a good IDE. I know just writing an interpreter/compiler or IDE is difficult but when two good ones come together it really makes something special happen, well at least in my eyes.
Reply


Messages In This Thread
QB successors - by wildcard - 09-02-2007, 06:56 PM
Re: QB successors - by Opresion - 09-03-2007, 01:39 PM
Re: QB successors - by MystikShadows - 09-03-2007, 02:43 PM
Re: QB successors - by Mac - 09-05-2007, 12:24 AM
Re: QB successors - by Dav - 09-05-2007, 04:17 AM
Re: QB successors - by Pete - 09-06-2007, 06:27 AM
Re: QB successors - by wildcard - 09-12-2007, 01:04 AM
Re: QB successors - by Deleter - 09-12-2007, 04:05 AM
Re: QB successors - by wildcard - 09-12-2007, 06:25 PM
Re: QB successors - by SMC - 09-14-2007, 02:32 PM
Re: QB successors - by Dav - 09-14-2007, 11:57 PM
Re: QB successors - by Dr_Davenstein - 09-15-2007, 06:38 AM
Re: QB successors - by SMC - 09-16-2007, 07:41 AM
Re: QB successors - by Dav - 09-16-2007, 05:12 PM
Re: QB successors - by SMC - 09-16-2007, 10:38 PM
Re: QB successors - by stylin - 09-20-2007, 12:08 AM
Re: QB successors - by Kevin_theprogrammer - 12-02-2007, 10:20 AM
Re: QB successors - by Dav - 12-05-2007, 09:31 PM
Re: QB successors - by anarky - 12-06-2007, 06:48 PM
Re: QB successors - by LPG - 04-14-2008, 11:38 AM
Re: QB successors - by Dav - 04-18-2008, 05:30 AM
Re: QB successors - by wildcard - 04-22-2008, 04:01 AM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)