02-13-2005, 11:32 PM
I like it how he takes the thing about old QB 4.5/7.1 source-code (It may compile fine) and somehow manages to completely change it's meaning.
Not to mention, that, if you read on, you realize that he writes medical programs.
But not only that, but he distributes the source, and then the hospital has to compile it themselves, each time they need the program.
Why else would he make that comment? :lol:
And not to diss or anything but:
"Others program sophisticated accounting programs and financial forcasting software that flexes the compiler's feature set to the max"
How would that be different from any other program? There's only a set number of commands, if every command works.. then uhm.. any properly coded program will work.. it's as simple as that.
"we can't be worried about stuff like that."
Nah, why bother writing flawless code when the compiler just hides the error and your faulty program runs anyways.
*Wanders off aimlessly.. crashes into wall.. recompiles with PB, wall goes away* WOHO!
Not to mention, that, if you read on, you realize that he writes medical programs.
But not only that, but he distributes the source, and then the hospital has to compile it themselves, each time they need the program.
Why else would he make that comment? :lol:
And not to diss or anything but:
"Others program sophisticated accounting programs and financial forcasting software that flexes the compiler's feature set to the max"
How would that be different from any other program? There's only a set number of commands, if every command works.. then uhm.. any properly coded program will work.. it's as simple as that.
"we can't be worried about stuff like that."
Nah, why bother writing flawless code when the compiler just hides the error and your faulty program runs anyways.
*Wanders off aimlessly.. crashes into wall.. recompiles with PB, wall goes away* WOHO!