03-24-2005, 01:22 PM
Hey Na_th_an,
I just wanted to apologise for any offence you may have felt in relation to the post I just directed at you. As you may imagine, I was somewhat offended by your originality critique. In my repIy to your objection, I was trying to put forward the argument that the originality issue you raised was irrelevant, as few qbasic projects are original. However, this is difficult as I have to define what an acceptable version of originality is. An appropriate definition would have led to a post the size of a Master's thesis. So, I took the easy way out, and attacked your credibility instead. I didn't think about this when I posted it, but I realise this must have been hurtful. So, I wish to take back those comments. I hope you can accept my apologies.
I just wanted to apologise for any offence you may have felt in relation to the post I just directed at you. As you may imagine, I was somewhat offended by your originality critique. In my repIy to your objection, I was trying to put forward the argument that the originality issue you raised was irrelevant, as few qbasic projects are original. However, this is difficult as I have to define what an acceptable version of originality is. An appropriate definition would have led to a post the size of a Master's thesis. So, I took the easy way out, and attacked your credibility instead. I didn't think about this when I posted it, but I realise this must have been hurtful. So, I wish to take back those comments. I hope you can accept my apologies.