Posts: 773
Threads: 71
Joined: Mar 2002
Some PHP forums automaticly shrink user's avatar no matter what size it is. I think that's a great feature which allows me to use various niffty images as my avatars in forums such as HOTU(
http://www.the-underdogs.org/forum/index.php ).
For example:
http://www.samods.com/~lachie/DEANCRY6.gif
Posts: 864
Threads: 13
Joined: Oct 2003
So.....what's the issue?
igitalblackie.com - Done!

Ask about our hosting
-Goddess of the of the No More Religion Threads movement
Posts: 292
Threads: 31
Joined: Apr 2003
This issue is he likes it, thereby implying he would like to see it here (or is it here already?). Personally, I don't think there's any need because no one here has those huge annoying avatars....
Posts: 3,343
Threads: 83
Joined: Mar 2003
Those "huge, annoying avatars" are against the rules anyway
Actually, AFAIK there's been so much complaint about having that not standard in phpBB 2.0.X that it's gonna be added to 2.2
Posts: 1,845
Threads: 44
Joined: Aug 2002
Quote:Those "huge, annoying avatars" are against the rules anyway 
IMHO I agree with the rules of avatars not bigger than, what was it?, 15 kB.
Posts: 4,307
Threads: 63
Joined: May 2003
Ok, autoshrinking may be good but it should shrink in proportion and not make a mess of it while doing so.
Posts: 3,343
Threads: 83
Joined: Mar 2003
On the contrary, it
should make a mess of it so the user is forced to obey the rules
And it's 15K Neo
(thx SCM)
Posts: 1,845
Threads: 44
Joined: Aug 2002
Quote:And it's 15K Neo 
Oops... Corrected it
Quote:On the contrary, it should make a mess of it so the user is forced to obey the rules 
If you think that... wouldn't it be much better just to make a routine that prints out a random crap picture instead of the avatar? :lol:
Posts: 773
Threads: 71
Joined: Mar 2002
I'm sure this forum could be modifyied on that way so that user can pick if he wants to use an avatar under 80*80 or a bigger one shrinked to size preset by the admin.
Posts: 1,845
Threads: 44
Joined: Aug 2002
Quote:I'm sure this forum could be modifyied on that way so that user can pick if he wants to use an avatar under 80*80 or a bigger one shrinked to size preset by the admin.
There are some problems with that. See further points.
1. Big avatars require a lot of space
2. Have you thought about telephone modem (28/56k) users?
3. If the routine that shrank the avatars would be client-sided, there'd be much more code to download and to process, thereby slowing down the page downlad.
4. If the routine that shrank the avatars would be server-sided, the server would have to be a powerful computer to deal with many of that routine calls.