Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
How does OOP compile?
#11
:roll:
I'd knock on wood, but my desk is particle board.
Reply
#12
Quote:But, my superior intellect does not require the use of OOP.

Now there I see a hint of arrogance. Everyone has different opinions.

My opinion is OOP is a great way to program :king:
Reply
#13
Quote:OOP is not the new system, it has been around since the 70's, it is just a different style of programming. OOP will never replace structural programming, because different styles suit different projects, a good programmer knows when to pick what language and style.
What I mean by that is the sense that most C programmers back in the day were taught to believe that C was "it" and everything else wasn't worth anything. To them, OOP was a "new system". Hence came all the BS about speed/size differences. It's really not all THAT different, especially on modern computers and with today's highly efficient optimizing compilers. Maybe back then there was more of a difference, but as things have a way of hanging on, the misconceptions still persist. Intel uses this very same concept to promote how "fast" their latest processors are (basing it on the MHz, and making it seem like a higher MHz computer is automatically faster, because the populous has come to accept such a fact, because it USED to be true...).
I'd knock on wood, but my desk is particle board.
Reply
#14
Yeah, AMD's 2.2Ghz kicks Intel 3.2Ghz processor's (with HT) arse :rotfl:
Reply
#15
I personally think that the only thing hyper about hyperthreading is just that...THE HYPE!!!
I'd knock on wood, but my desk is particle board.
Reply
#16
OOP isnt that far removed. Objects are a step away from structures and pointers. It's just another, higher level. It lets you get simple issues done fast, and makes complex tasks simpler. You want speed, go procedural or right down to low-level.
i]"I know what you're thinking. Did he fire six shots or only five? Well, to tell you the truth, in all this excitement, I've kinda lost track myself. But being as this is a .44 Magnum ... you've got to ask yourself one question: 'Do I feel lucky?' Well, do ya punk?"[/i] - Dirty Harry
Reply
#17
Quote:I personally think that the only thing hyper about hyperthreading is just that...THE HYPE!!!

I disagree. Hyperthreading seems to be a way to use two processors in one... Parallel processors can = more speed.
Peace cannot be obtained without war. Why? If there is already peace, it is unnecessary for war. If there is no peace, there is already war."

Visit www.neobasic.net to see rubbish in all its finest.
Reply
#18
The reason I think HT is all hype is because when we bought up the server farm in NJ, the owner was bragging about HT this and HT that...when all the servers are single-CPU P4's. If HT relates to multiple processors, where does HT enter the picture with single processors? I haven't really looked into HT very much so I can't say much on the subject outside of what I've experienced from the bonehead who sold me the servers Big Grin
I'd knock on wood, but my desk is particle board.
Reply
#19
I believe it is one CPU but some parts are duplicated to make it *sometimes* act like two.
Peace cannot be obtained without war. Why? If there is already peace, it is unnecessary for war. If there is no peace, there is already war."

Visit www.neobasic.net to see rubbish in all its finest.
Reply
#20
I don't get what the point of OOP is...I've tinkered with it, and unless you're really doing something abstract, or something that would make REALLY clean code with OOP, like, a car-building prog (Car, subclass: engine, subclass: pistons, subclass: ...etc...), it doesn't make sense.
Give me one instance where it would be necessary.
f only life let you press CTRL-Z.
--------------------------------------
Freebasic is like QB, except it doesn't suck.
Reply


Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)