11-16-2002, 11:53 PM
The graphical look isn't very much to talk about
because it's in DOS SCREEN 0
-but hey all things are there...
because it's in DOS SCREEN 0
-but hey all things are there...
/post]
| Poll: Is the QB IDE the best IDE you've used? You do not have permission to vote in this poll. |
|||
| Yes | 22 | 100.00% | |
| Total | 22 vote(s) | 100% | |
| * You voted for this item. | [Show Results] |
|
How do you rate the QB IDE?
|
11-17-2002, 12:01 AM
Quote:The graphical look isn't very much to talk about What you call "not much to talk about", is functional. I personally prefer it to any other IDE/Editor I've used elsewhere(Windows or MS-DOS based) 
11-17-2002, 05:57 AM
Functionality over graphics. Hmmm... it's really necessary to have a super-graphical-interface-with-lotsa-buttons-and-mice-support to write a piece of code?
 Anyways, I find the QB IDE incredibly schweet, but to claim that's the best IDE sounds for me a bit strange. Just my opinion. 8)
img]http://usuarios.vtr.net/~disaster/sigs/annoyizer.php[/img]
11-18-2002, 03:12 AM
The QB IDE is the best I've used. Its got great futures. For simple editing e.g. for perl I don't need anything more than notepad or edit.. but IDEs are always nice to help. The IDE for MS-VC 4.0 was 'orrible ;-)
11-18-2002, 09:49 PM
Heh... I have to agree with you about VC's IDE. Notepad is more user-friendly than that.
img]http://usuarios.vtr.net/~disaster/sigs/annoyizer.php[/img]
11-19-2002, 02:07 AM
I thing the QB Ide is kicka$$.
Pardon my language.
o, let me get this straight. You want to fly on a magic carpet to see the King of the Potato People and plead with him for your freedom, and you're telling me you are completely sane?! -A.J. Rimmer
11-27-2002, 10:08 AM
first off, qb's ide was DEFINATELY advanced for 1987. there are features in there that easily rival the best ides today, most notably the case-correction and syntax checking. i'm sure they had the ability to highlight syntax back then, but think to yourself... in 16-color screen zero text dont tell me that wouldnt look *slightly* wierd. also, it would make customizing colors waay to difficult. no, i value the two forementioned features high above syntax highlighting. i recognize my own code, and i dont need it. frankly, i'd like to see some of these features put into modern 32-bit ides. the only other kind i can stand for qb editing is notepad with the font set to terminal...
i]"I know what you're thinking. Did he fire six shots or only five? Well, to tell you the truth, in all this excitement, I've kinda lost track myself. But being as this is a .44 Magnum ... you've got to ask yourself one question: 'Do I feel lucky?' Well, do ya punk?"[/i] - Dirty Harry
11-27-2002, 03:33 PM
Advanced for 1987 yes... But now...
However, it's still THE BEST. Maybe there will also be a Windows version of the Old Dos QB IDE. Which can handle resolutions from the old 320x200 to 3200x2400 or something. What about it? 
11-28-2002, 02:01 AM
as I said "It's all there";
The only(?) thing that differs from win32 IDEs is the GRAPHICS! (okay I've only seen one other: Bloodsheed Dev C++)
/post]
|
|
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)