Posts: 788
Threads: 53
Joined: Nov 2002
This version won't have any problems as dos versions since it uses directdraw.
And obviously, no more ems xms or anything like that. There will only be one kind of surface, memory ones that can be up to 4 GB.
oship me and i will give you lots of guurrls and beeea
Posts: 658
Threads: 71
Joined: Sep 2003
Yes, I am!
Will it be old uGL syntax compotable?
url]http://fbide.sourceforge.net/[/url]
Posts: 788
Threads: 53
Joined: Nov 2002
Yes, i will make a wrapper for FB so that syntax is the same. But behind the scenes it will be highly obejct oriented. For instance a DC will now be an object and will have all the routines in it.
uglPset mydc, x, y, col Will be
mydc.pset( x, y, col )
Later on if/when v1ctor adds objects you will be able to use the oo version directly.
oship me and i will give you lots of guurrls and beeea
Posts: 658
Threads: 71
Joined: Sep 2003
cool
url]http://fbide.sourceforge.net/[/url]
Posts: 6,419
Threads: 74
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 1,774
Threads: 62
Joined: Aug 2003
I'm also interested!
Posts: 602
Threads: 27
Joined: Oct 2004
bah go away with your crappy software renderer hehe...
seriously JIPEE theni can port my fps to fb
quote="NecrosIhsan"]
[/quote]
Posts: 1,272
Threads: 36
Joined: Feb 2003
Quote:uglPset mydc, x, y, col Will be
mydc.pset( x, y, col )
Later on if/when v1ctor adds objects you will be able to use the oo version directly.
Isn't that syntax already possible with FB's function pointer support?
Posts: 1,688
Threads: 119
Joined: Jun 2003
Yes! Let's see UGL 32 bit!
Jumping Jahoolipers!
Posts: 979
Threads: 27
Joined: Aug 2001
Heh. Maybe then you'll get some more respect from the guys around here