Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
New signature.
#21
What!? :-?
Reply
#22
Quote:Well my signature is quite small, is optimized (10kb), and doesn't do any retarded PHP crap.

However, I hate pictures in sigs that are 300 px tall, are dynamic and are anything more than 10kb.

Should I remove mine?
quote="na_th_an"]
Greenday, Spice Girls... Can you tell the difference?
[/quote]
Reply
#23
I honestly don't mind a large graphical, etc. etc. signature, I simply have Firefox not load it after the first time I see it.
his sig left intentionally blank
Reply
#24
Quote:
aetherfox Wrote:Well my signature is quite small, is optimized (10kb), and doesn't do any retarded PHP crap.

However, I hate pictures in sigs that are 300 px tall, are dynamic and are anything more than 10kb.

Should I remove mine?

yep
i]"But...it was so beautifully done"[/i]
Reply
#25
signatures suck.

- Eric
ignatures suck
Reply
#26
I really don't care,. Offensive Screename's doesn't bother me.. Good way to know who's posting.. *Keeps line of site on messages, looks a sig to see who post it* simple,. :wink: :lol:
Kevin (x.t.r.GRAPHICS)

[Image: 11895-r.png]
Reply


Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)