09-10-2005, 04:05 PM
(?)
am the last survivor of the Quickbasics world (at least at qbasicnews).
| Poll: Your favorite Quickbasic? You do not have permission to vote in this poll. |
|||
| GW-Basic. | 25 | 100.00% | |
| Qbasic I.IO | 0 | 0% | |
| Quickbasic 4.5O (QB). | 0 | 0% | |
| Quickbasic 7.IO (QBX, PDS). | 0 | 0% | |
| VisBasic for Dos. | 0 | 0% | |
| Anyone. | 0 | 0% | |
| Another one not listed. | 0 | 0% | |
| Total | 25 vote(s) | 100% | |
| * You voted for this item. | [Show Results] |
|
Your favorite Quickbasic?
|
 
09-10-2005, 04:41 PM
I voted for VB-DOS professional. :-).
It's a bit more than PDS and the user interface is a bit better when working on bigger projects.
hen they say it can't be done, THAT's when they call me ;-).
![[Image: kaffee.gif]](http://www.ascii-world.com/old_asciiworld/kaffee.gif) ![[Image: mystikshadows.png]](http://www.adaworld.com/mystikshadows.png) need hosting: http://www.jc-hosting.net All about ASCII: http://www.ascii-world.com 
09-10-2005, 07:01 PM
I use VBDOS, more features than QB and a better interface (especially if you use 50 lines display).
If swimming is so good for your figure, how do you explain walruses?
09-10-2005, 07:15 PM
Agreed Jacob...very functional at 50 lines :-). but I still wish it could go 132x60 lol.
hen they say it can't be done, THAT's when they call me ;-).
need hosting: http://www.jc-hosting.net All about ASCII: http://www.ascii-world.com 
09-10-2005, 09:26 PM
i think it may be a little more appropriate to title this "Your favorite BASIC compiler"
but anyways, i'm a QBX fan....never really got into VBDos oz~ 
09-20-2005, 02:33 PM
As always, the list is uncorrect. There's not such a thing as QuickBasic 7.1. Last QB version was 4.5.
You have PDS 7.1 which has the MS Basic Compiler 7.1. Not QuickBasic. It's a completely different line of products. Read http://www.ojodepez-fanzine.net/network/qbdl for more info.
SCUMM (the band) on Myspace!
ComputerEmuzone Games Studio underBASIC, homegrown musicians [img]http://www.ojodepez-fanzine.net/almacen/yoghourtslover.png[/i 
09-21-2005, 01:34 AM
I think qb4.5. is best, but thats probably because its the lanquage I most use to using, well apart from PHP, which I am even more familiar with, but thats not basic...
atos-Software
http://www.datacentertalk.com - interested in how web hosting works? Here the place to go to find out.
09-21-2005, 03:29 AM
I think that PDS 7.1 was the best because it allowed to use much more memory for strings and it was one of the very few compilers that allowed the creation of OS/2 16 bit applications.
Regards, Mark 
09-21-2005, 04:10 AM
As for quickbasic, that would be PDS 7.1, I used the heck out of that.... Even so much I had to reinstall the libs every so often from over use it seems... :lol: ...
(I was about to hit Other and say FB,.. but since its SOO dark side-ish,.. I wanted to avoid any sad new flame agianst something so nice,.. as of today,.. it is my favorite... =) )
Kevin (x.t.r.GRAPHICS)
![[Image: 11895-r.png]](http://fileanchor.com/11895-r.png)
|
|
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
![[Image: freebasic.png]](http://www.deleter.phatcode.net/freebasic.png)
Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)