Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
My logo...
#21
@xteraco: Now that is a sweet logo Big Grin

@Kevin: If you add a drop shadow around the folder, creating a border between the yellow and white, it should add a sense of depth to it, as seen here:
[Image: infrosoftbetter.jpg]
Itch-Five Design - Your source for free, well designed, web design.
- - - - - - - - - - - - -
Quote:I use QB religiously. Too bad I'm an athiest.
Reply
#22
How about this:
[Image: 359.jpg]
[Image: 1403.png]
^ Infrosoft
http://www.thecodeyouneed.us.to/ - A wiki of source code, mostly in PHP and FreeBASIC
http://www.osadvocacy.uk.to/ - Your opinion matters no matter your OS
Reply
#23
Great Big Grin
Reply
#24
Quote:How about this:
[Image: 359.jpg]
Very nice =)
Reply
#25
Quote:How about this:
[Image: 359.jpg]
Awesome!! 8)

:wink:
Kevin (x.t.r.GRAPHICS)

[Image: 11895-r.png]
Reply
#26
Guys...you simply have to know when to use each format. JPEG is for photographs...what do you think the P means? Photographic. Big Grin Images with colour pools do not compress well with JPEG, so line art, cartoons, low bitdepth stuff, etc. do not look good as JPEG. You're better off with PNG on those types of images. And yes, JPEG is always lossy unless you use the lossless JPEG algorithm which is not exactly widespread. Using 100% quality JPEG does NOT equate to a lossless JPEG, it simply means that the encoder will try to preserve the original image as closely as possible without breaking the compression algorithm.
\__/)
(='.'=) Copy bunny into your signature to
(")_(") help him gain world domination.
Reply
#27
Quote:Guys...you simply have to know when to use each format. JPEG is for photographs...what do you think the P means? Photographic. Big Grin Images with colour pools do not compress well with JPEG, so line art, cartoons, low bitdepth stuff, etc. do not look good as JPEG. You're better off with PNG on those types of images. And yes, JPEG is always lossy unless you use the lossless JPEG algorithm which is not exactly widespread. Using 100% quality JPEG does NOT equate to a lossless JPEG, it simply means that the encoder will try to preserve the original image as closely as possible without breaking the compression algorithm.
Just what I said.. Tongue Dont you try to steal my knowledge skills dave, or i'll uhm.. slap you!
Reply
#28
I think it's about time to call that naked female ninjas army.
SCUMM (the band) on Myspace!
ComputerEmuzone Games Studio
underBASIC, homegrown musicians
[img]http://www.ojodepez-fanzine.net/almacen/yoghourtslover.png[/i
Reply
#29
Quote:How about this:
[Image: 359.jpg]

That is much better than the original. I was going to suggest outlining the original folder, but now it's 3d, it looks perfect-o

oz~
Reply
#30
Its a better version, But the artifacts caused by the jpeg compression look awful.

As 10 people have already said... learn when to use suitable formats.

For an image with block colours, use png
For an image with few colours in it use gif
For a complicated image with lots of shades, jpeg.
Reply


Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)