Posts: 970
Threads: 77
Joined: Jun 2002
www.imageanchor.com
It's a much more simple interface to FileAnchor that only allows images to be uploaded. We think everything is good and working on it, but we'd like it if you guys tested it.
You should be able to log into it just as you would FileAnchor (the username's and all data storage are the same between the two sites).
Let us know if you like or dislike anything about it and any bugs you find.
Thanks
Posts: 476
Threads: 35
Joined: May 2006
:aah:
I love you guys...
Posts: 780
Threads: 49
Joined: Dec 2001
Sorry, can't compare to the incredible:
http://allyoucanupload.webshots.com/. I'll use fileanchor more though
.
Have you considered having an option to add more upload slots on one page? I love batch uploads, that alone is probably the reason I'll use allyoucanupload.
Posts: 970
Threads: 77
Joined: Jun 2002
Quote:Have you considered having an option to add more upload slots on one page? I love batch uploads, that alone is probably the reason I'll use allyoucanupload.
Yes, we've thought about it lots of times. Just never implemented it. Batch uploads are going to be available for sure on the new version of FileAnchor we're working on.
Webshots can't do files though 8)
Posts: 838
Threads: 17
Joined: Jan 2002
ImageAnchor can do multiple files now too :cool2:
url=http://www.copy-pasta.com]CopyPasta[/url] -
FilePasta
Posts: 2,404
Threads: 153
Joined: Jan 2005
Cool! :wtnod2:
Kevin (
x.t.r.GRAPHICS)
Posts: 2,771
Threads: 96
Joined: Oct 2003
Why did you make a new site? Why cant fileanchor fufil the same purpose as imageanchor?
Posts: 970
Threads: 77
Joined: Jun 2002
Quote:Why did you make a new site? Why cant fileanchor fufil the same purpose as imageanchor?
ImageAnchor is FileAnchor. It's just a different face for it. Everything still runs off the FileAnchor backend.
The reason we made ImageAnchor is because people wanted something a little less cluttered and stripped down. ImageAnchor is just a different method of uploading pictures to FileAnchor, but it's going to offer some image specific features. Both sites will end up working just as good but ImageAnchor ImageAnchor will probably end up with more features for now as it's code is easier to add features to :rotfl:
Honestly i havent been able to figure that one out myself, KiZ. Either way its choose button, dialog box, select file, upload...
I don't get it but whooo for people who think it's cool I guess... ;p
Posts: 970
Threads: 77
Joined: Jun 2002
Quote:Honestly i havent been able to figure that one out myself, KiZ. Either way its choose button, dialog box, select file, upload...
I don't get it but whooo for people who think it's cool I guess... ;p
FileAnchor is up to like 537920947 tabs now and updates all over the front page. ImageAnchor just has the upload box, the random feature and my images. It seems a lot easier (at least in my eyes) than FileAnchor to someone just looking for the file hosting service.
We've actually received specific complaints about FileAnchor having too much stuff on it and wanting something a bit more simple.