![]() |
Sig rules - Printable Version +- Qbasicnews.com (http://qbasicnews.com/newforum) +-- Forum: QbasicNews.Com (http://qbasicnews.com/newforum/forum-3.html) +--- Forum: Site/Forum Issues (http://qbasicnews.com/newforum/forum-9.html) +--- Thread: Sig rules (/thread-2495.html) |
Sig rules - Rhiannon - 11-15-2003 what are the sig rules for the forum in terms of size? Sig rules - toonski84 - 11-15-2003 there's a universal "try and keep it under 5 lines" etiquette I believe. Sig rules - Rhiannon - 11-15-2003 size as in pixel wise, not lines. Sig rules - adosorken - 11-16-2003 That sig totally rules ![]() ![]() Sig rules - toonski84 - 11-16-2003 I dont have a whole lot of beef with it. Kinda distracting having a white bg overa grey/black page, but I dont think anyone cares. Sig rules - adosorken - 11-16-2003 I like my new sig... :evil: Sig rules - oracle - 11-17-2003 Sig images: 3 max, 10K max pls. And don't make it 300px high either, but your image is fine ![]() Sig rules - adosorken - 11-18-2003 Quote:Sig images: 3 max, 10K max pls.10K? Sure...and 16 colors. ![]() Sig rules - oracle - 11-18-2003 JPG ![]() Sig rules - adosorken - 11-18-2003 If your browser's not on crackers, it won't have to download it but only once. It's not anyone else's fault except your own if you don't know how to set up your cache. ![]() And JPEG sucks for images with a lot of color coherance. PNG works better for such images. For the most part, knowing how and when to use each image format produces far smaller files. Anyone who uses JPEG for a cartoon image is looking to get their ass kicked, and anyone who uses PNG for a photograph is facing the same fate. ![]() |