Poll: pro death penalty
You do not have permission to vote in this poll.
yes
100.00%
22 100.00%
no
0%
0 0%
Total 22 vote(s) 100%
* You voted for this item. [Show Results]

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
death penalty
#1
what is your opinion
Reply
#2
it's more expensive to send someone to death row than life in prison.
igitalblackie.com - Done! Smile Ask about our hosting Wink

-Goddess of the of the No More Religion Threads movement Smile
Reply
#3
No.
Peace cannot be obtained without war. Why? If there is already peace, it is unnecessary for war. If there is no peace, there is already war."

Visit www.neobasic.net to see rubbish in all its finest.
Reply
#4
yes, aga. It's called the appeals process. But this is if the person has a good lawyer and some money. If a bum kills a guy, there won't be much fuss over his execution.

But screw costs. Either way, it's going to cost a lot to keep a dangerous person from society. I'm against the death penalty soley because the court isnt perfect, and there's been a ridiculous amount of innocently executed people in the past 20 years. If you could be sure, I'd be cool with it, but it's better to have 10 guilty men locked up than 1 innocent man executed.
i]"I know what you're thinking. Did he fire six shots or only five? Well, to tell you the truth, in all this excitement, I've kinda lost track myself. But being as this is a .44 Magnum ... you've got to ask yourself one question: 'Do I feel lucky?' Well, do ya punk?"[/i] - Dirty Harry
Reply
#5
Yeah, I agree precisely on that point.
Peace cannot be obtained without war. Why? If there is already peace, it is unnecessary for war. If there is no peace, there is already war."

Visit www.neobasic.net to see rubbish in all its finest.
Reply
#6
Death penalty is animals' stuff.

A shame that you, "the guardians of freedom" allow it in so many states. Shame.
SCUMM (the band) on Myspace!
ComputerEmuzone Games Studio
underBASIC, homegrown musicians
[img]http://www.ojodepez-fanzine.net/almacen/yoghourtslover.png[/i
Reply
#7
Even more so because it's hard to get some one back from the death if you suddenly find out they didn't commit the crime. From my point of view, death penalty is like torture.
url=http://www.copy-pasta.com]CopyPasta[/url] - FilePasta
Reply
#8
Exactly my point. In Spanish, when a judge gives a veredict, it is called "fail", it is something like "The judge's fail is 'guilty'" or "The judge's fail is 'innocent'", assuming that humans can make mistakes. Anyhow, if you are judging someone 'cause he decided that he could kill someone (and that's wrong) and then you kill that person if you find him or her guilty, you are commiting the same crime. "An eye for an eye" doesn't work nowadays, from my point of view. It is just a nonsense from its basis. Who has the will to decide upon another human being right to live?

This is a messy territory, I know. Everyone who has suffered of a kill in his or her family is obviously biased and wants "justice". I just think that there are several ways to apply justice. If you are out of the trouble, you can always think that everyone can make mistakes and probably many people will feel remorseful after that, and that fact obviously changes if you are related to an assassined person. But even in that situation, I strongly feel that a life on jail is far a bigger punishment than death penalty, and it is more "human" for the solely reason that you are not becoming what the offender is: an assassin.
SCUMM (the band) on Myspace!
ComputerEmuzone Games Studio
underBASIC, homegrown musicians
[img]http://www.ojodepez-fanzine.net/almacen/yoghourtslover.png[/i
Reply
#9
The death penalty is a tricky issue and one that is embroiled in the a general problem of the US government (and I'm sure other governments too).

Even if a person is "for the death penalty", the potential for ambiguity is enourmous. For instance, what constitutes incriminating evidence? First one can consider the case of blood on the hands of the criminal with a knife in hand and no one else (except the police) for miles. That would definetly say S/HE'S GUILTY. But then you add all other sorts of things and it becomes increasingly likely that S/HE'S NOT GUILTY.

This rambling could now continue into a discussion of the welfare state in the US, but it would just be rambling from that point...
Peace cannot be obtained without war. Why? If there is already peace, it is unnecessary for war. If there is no peace, there is already war."

Visit www.neobasic.net to see rubbish in all its finest.
Reply
#10
I'm just interested by the fact that of all the developed countries in the world, only the U.S. kills children by death penalty. Even China doesn't kill under 18s!

The US even kills retarded people!!!!

That's one reason why I'm against GB. How many people did he execute? Directly or indirectly?
Reply


Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 2 Guest(s)