Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Decompiler
#11
There was once a decompiler for VB 3, which is also interpreted, so I don't see why a QB decompiler couldn't be written. Funny thing tho, the authors of the VB decompiler said it was for valid purposes (academic pursuits or something) and not stealing code... that would last about as long as Napster when the RIAA is around... hehe.
Reply


Messages In This Thread
Decompiler - by whitetiger0990 - 05-04-2003, 11:46 PM
(Sigh.) I'm feeling hungry again. - by Glenn - 05-05-2003, 12:04 AM
Decompiler - by toonski84 - 05-05-2003, 12:48 AM
Decompiler - by Dav - 05-05-2003, 01:30 AM
Decompiler - by whitetiger0990 - 05-05-2003, 01:39 AM
Decompiler - by oracle - 05-05-2003, 07:24 AM
Decompiler - by toonski84 - 05-05-2003, 07:48 AM
Decompiler - by oracle - 05-05-2003, 08:53 AM
Decompiler - by DrV - 05-06-2003, 04:47 AM
Decompiler - by Agamemnus - 05-06-2003, 05:04 AM
VB's different than QB. - by Glenn - 05-06-2003, 06:06 AM
Decompiler - by Agamemnus - 05-06-2003, 08:05 AM
Re: VB's different than QB. - by DrV - 05-07-2003, 04:50 AM
Maybe on the surface. - by Glenn - 05-07-2003, 05:20 AM
Decompiler - by DrV - 05-07-2003, 05:25 AM
That's nice. - by Glenn - 05-07-2003, 06:42 AM
Re: Decompiler - by Strychnine - 05-12-2003, 06:28 PM
Decompiler - by Hexadecimal Disaster - 05-13-2003, 05:58 AM
Decompiler - by wizardlife - 05-13-2003, 08:07 AM
Decompiler - by Agamemnus - 05-13-2003, 08:32 AM
Decompiler - by wizardlife - 05-13-2003, 08:49 AM
True. - by Agamemnus - 05-13-2003, 07:17 PM
Decompiler - by Antoni Gual - 05-14-2003, 02:47 AM
Decompiler - by Antoni Gual - 05-14-2003, 02:54 AM
Decompiler - by Agamemnus - 05-14-2003, 04:03 AM
Decompiler - by Hexadecimal Disaster - 05-14-2003, 05:51 AM
You're a tad confused. - by Glenn - 05-14-2003, 08:26 AM
glen you are so wrong. - by Agamemnus - 05-14-2003, 08:40 AM
Decompiler - by Agamemnus - 05-15-2003, 01:36 AM
Decompiler - by na_th_an - 05-15-2003, 02:16 AM
Decompiler - by wizardlife - 05-15-2003, 02:31 AM
Decompiler - by toonski84 - 05-15-2003, 02:55 AM
Decompiler - by Hexadecimal Disaster - 05-15-2003, 05:13 AM
No I didn't. - by Glenn - 05-15-2003, 06:14 AM
Decompiler - by Ninkazu - 05-15-2003, 06:20 AM
How so? - by Glenn - 05-15-2003, 07:15 AM
Decompiler - by Hexadecimal Disaster - 05-15-2003, 07:36 AM
Yes, that would be it... - by Glenn - 05-15-2003, 09:38 AM
Decompiler - by Hexadecimal Disaster - 05-15-2003, 10:12 AM
Decompiler - by DrV - 05-16-2003, 05:28 AM
Decompiler - by Agamemnus - 05-16-2003, 05:33 AM
Decompiler - by DrV - 05-16-2003, 05:36 AM
Decompiler - by Agamemnus - 05-16-2003, 06:51 AM
Decompiler - by Agamemnus - 05-16-2003, 08:35 PM
Oh, shut up. - by Glenn - 05-16-2003, 10:16 PM
Decompiler - by Agamemnus - 05-16-2003, 11:09 PM
You had a really hard time when you... - by Glenn - 05-16-2003, 11:47 PM
Decompiler - by toonski84 - 05-17-2003, 01:07 AM
Decompiler - by LooseCaboose - 05-17-2003, 04:11 PM
Decompiler - by na_th_an - 05-17-2003, 05:19 PM
No. - by Agamemnus - 05-17-2003, 06:53 PM
Decompiler - by Agamemnus - 05-17-2003, 11:41 PM
Decompiler - by Agamemnus - 05-18-2003, 03:11 AM
Decompiler - by Agamemnus - 05-18-2003, 05:38 AM
I think it's the word "perfect." - by Glenn - 05-18-2003, 08:39 AM
Decompiler - by LooseCaboose - 05-18-2003, 10:25 AM
Decompiler - by Agamemnus - 05-18-2003, 07:56 PM
Decompiler - by relsoft - 05-19-2003, 11:44 AM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)