10-20-2004, 05:52 AM
Superb work, Pete. I found the article about the QB Top 50 particularly interesting, because I'm wondering if QB Worlds webring - now with around 70 members - is in a similar postion to develop into a hub site to support the QB network like the old QBT50 did. In the past I've decided against it because:
a) I didn't want webring members to think that, through the QB Worlds portal, they were just linking to somebody else's site that was 'stealing the thunder' of the other sites in the webring.
b) My PHP skills are not yet ready for such a task
I may still add a forum for discussing suggestions and improvements to webring. So I guess I could try that and see if anybody uses it for starters..
Anyway, we now have a shiny new easy-to-remember URL:
http://qbworlds.qbasicnews.com
(Thanks wildcard
)
a) I didn't want webring members to think that, through the QB Worlds portal, they were just linking to somebody else's site that was 'stealing the thunder' of the other sites in the webring.
b) My PHP skills are not yet ready for such a task
I may still add a forum for discussing suggestions and improvements to webring. So I guess I could try that and see if anybody uses it for starters..
Anyway, we now have a shiny new easy-to-remember URL:
http://qbworlds.qbasicnews.com
(Thanks wildcard
)
In a world without walls and doors, who needs Windows and Gates?