03-01-2005, 04:42 AM
I'll take the opportunity given by this thread to say "hi" to the documentation forum, I like the approach things seem to be heading for.
I've had a quick look at the guideline docs, and for the little I know about xml it seems ok to me.
As for this thread, let me say that it's ok to experiment with the gfxlib docs, as long as you don't want to produce final docs... Unless you got the gfxlib.txt file currently in CVS, which will be shipped with FB 0.12; since 0.11 the gfxlib docs have been updated to reflect the many internal changes, so even the BLOAD docs is different in 0.12 compared to 0.11 (the 0.12 version reports about BMP loading support).
So if you want to start porting gfxlib docs to the new xml format, either use the gfxlib.txt out of CVS either wait for 0.12...
I've had a quick look at the guideline docs, and for the little I know about xml it seems ok to me.
As for this thread, let me say that it's ok to experiment with the gfxlib docs, as long as you don't want to produce final docs... Unless you got the gfxlib.txt file currently in CVS, which will be shipped with FB 0.12; since 0.11 the gfxlib docs have been updated to reflect the many internal changes, so even the BLOAD docs is different in 0.12 compared to 0.11 (the 0.12 version reports about BMP loading support).
So if you want to start porting gfxlib docs to the new xml format, either use the gfxlib.txt out of CVS either wait for 0.12...
ngelo Mottola - EC++