06-15-2006, 07:13 PM
Quote:Alright, SJ Zero, I have no freaking clue what your integration notations stand for, but integrate this, if you can:
Aga, I proved my own theory(and confirmed it with outside sources). If, considering your supposed math qualifications, you refuse to do the same, then I can't take you seriously in your protestations. Thus far, you've presented one critically flawed piece of mathematical evidence and little else.
Therefore, unless you have either numbers, or a corralary to the theory which actually helps this "cold light gas" theory get off the ground, act like an adult and accept that what you were thinking in the shower is incorrect. The physical world isn't going to change because you try to fire out a theory regardless of the logic behind it.
Now, I'd like to add a few things:
-We know the mass of the earth, more or less, based on the distance from the sun and the speed we're moving. This is something we've managed to do by knowing the same theory of gravitation we've been arguing over. If a large chunk of the earth were made out of light gass, then the density of the earth would be such that geologists would consistently find the mass of the earth to be much much less than expected.
-We know how sound travels through the earth. Seismographs taken around the world at the moment of an earthquake all show minute differences in how they register the 'sound' of an earthquake because the sound travels through the earth. The numbers given imply a solid outside, a molten semi-inside, and a hard core. A hollow earth would give spectacularly different results.
-Absolute Pressure remains relevant. The reason I keep talking about pressure is that there isn't going to be any 'super cold gas'(Which is an unscientific term as used here, by the way -- The terms super cooled and super heated refer to the temperature relative to phase change points. 1ata Steam at 100C is saturated steam. 1ata Steam at 110C is superheated steam. 1ata Steam at 90C is supercooled steam. Since there is no good reason to assume you meant the actual definition of the word, since you describe no phenomena to suggest a non-newtonian fluid, I'm assuming that you simply mean a relatively cold gas) that remains a gas unless the absolute pressure is almost vacuum. Simply put, there's no reason to believe that the center of our earth is a vacuum relative to outer space. It runs counter to the currently accepted theories about the creation of the planet. The forces would literally have to drag the matter in the middle of the earth outward with enough force to raise the surface to create this effect, and the only way that might happen is through alien intervention. No matter what you think gravity is capable of, the Law of Conservation of Energy more or less guarantees that Gravitational energy isn't going to raise and support the entire surface of the earth because of a bit of mass in the middle. Even if that were the case, the earth surely wouldn't accept this massive vacuum it could collapse upon.
Anyway, I'm done here. If you don't feel that this discussion is worth taking seriously, then I don't feel like having it with you. By all means, keep your unrealistic portrait of reality. Now everyone on this site knows what to make of your theories.