07-30-2003, 04:40 PM
:???: mech1031: since it has to do with this forum, i posted it on this forum. astonishing!!!
:barf: na_th_an: disappear, conquistador. you imposed yourself on me, not the opposite.
do you remembr what started this whole thread? my use of "nasty words".
so now... are you NOT a hypocrite?
8) LooseCaboose:
"a wiser approach may have been to either email him or using the private messaging" --- refer to what i told mech.
"Unfortunately, troll you did" --- how? i meant to say something to toonski. it's not that i titled my thread "all you _ucking _itches i'm gonna flame your _rses". it's not likely that a thread titled "toonksi" would attract 56, mostly abusive, replies.
i'm quoting you quoting myself... argh. anyway. yes, that is the only real evil thing i did say. but aga and me... well, 'tis a long story. and it's not personal. the rest of the "dirty words", if you wish, were responses. i didnt ask dogbert to forgive my poor choice of words or the size of my vocabulary. and his "forgiveness" is really insulting. and how is it fun, when i tell toonski something non-provoking (hey, it's my right to have feelings towards things)... and everybody preys on me.
let me quote me: "mech1031: THE TITLE WAS TOONSKI" vs. "toonski: it's not your thread any longer". notice the different tenses. for mech, i used "was", meaning, the previous topic. for toonski i used "is", the current topic. so yes, you might argue that "it's" might also be interpreted "it was" or "it has", although i would claim that this interpretation is very uncommon, and, had it not been clear before, i have clarified it now.
this topic is titled, "ANTItoonski", meaning everything-not-toonski, or in other words, not having anything to do with toonski. so unlike the previous topic, this one addresses all of you.
and as for "In fact, why were /you/ posting in toonski's thread?".... i'll take that as a rhetorical question.
why, we have a long history, which began in the days qb45-dot-com was dot-com. and i have read many of your posts here as well, so yeah, i'm able to judge you well, imho.
8) oracle:
yes, i guess several "LOCK THIS THREAD" messages and at least one "DELETE THIS ENTIRE THREAD" were not enough. sigh.
=-=-=-=
now you see why i like tree-forums? i can reply to each post directly, instead of having to address people one by one and quote them.
YHNBT (you have not been trolled)
HAND
[Flexibal>
:barf: na_th_an: disappear, conquistador. you imposed yourself on me, not the opposite.
Quote:I only have something to say. IMHO, this forum is different from Neozones and other forums mainly 'cause people is NICE here.
That's our rule: BE NICE... Is that negative, flexibal? I can understand that you come from a harsh forum, but here we try to be NICE.
You can call me hypocrit or warever you like to call me after you read this post. I'm not against you nor for you. I am just explaining why people got upset.
I prefer this forum over Neozone's. I prefer nice people and polite replies.
do you remembr what started this whole thread? my use of "nasty words".
Quote: I really don't give a f_ucking damn shi_t on any stuff you can babble, bug.
so now... are you NOT a hypocrite?
8) LooseCaboose:
"a wiser approach may have been to either email him or using the private messaging" --- refer to what i told mech.
"Unfortunately, troll you did" --- how? i meant to say something to toonski. it's not that i titled my thread "all you _ucking _itches i'm gonna flame your _rses". it's not likely that a thread titled "toonksi" would attract 56, mostly abusive, replies.
Quote:Quote: aga: shove your nose between your lower cheeks
i'm quoting you quoting myself... argh. anyway. yes, that is the only real evil thing i did say. but aga and me... well, 'tis a long story. and it's not personal. the rest of the "dirty words", if you wish, were responses. i didnt ask dogbert to forgive my poor choice of words or the size of my vocabulary. and his "forgiveness" is really insulting. and how is it fun, when i tell toonski something non-provoking (hey, it's my right to have feelings towards things)... and everybody preys on me.
Quote:From point one, you told Mech that it wasn't his place to post because the thread has toonski's name on it, the thread in quiestion hasn't as yet been renamed, so I would say by /your/ logic it's still toonski's thread. In fact, why were /you/ posting in toonski's thread?
let me quote me: "mech1031: THE TITLE WAS TOONSKI" vs. "toonski: it's not your thread any longer". notice the different tenses. for mech, i used "was", meaning, the previous topic. for toonski i used "is", the current topic. so yes, you might argue that "it's" might also be interpreted "it was" or "it has", although i would claim that this interpretation is very uncommon, and, had it not been clear before, i have clarified it now.
this topic is titled, "ANTItoonski", meaning everything-not-toonski, or in other words, not having anything to do with toonski. so unlike the previous topic, this one addresses all of you.
and as for "In fact, why were /you/ posting in toonski's thread?".... i'll take that as a rhetorical question.
Quote:Well first of I am amazed that you were so quickly able to judge my character from reading one post, although in return I would have to say that its a pity that sarcasm seems lost on you. I know what the original post was about and how you seem to love being a smart-alec, I simply thought I would join in on the fun. I apologize most profusely for having offended you in any way, doubly so for having done it in a public thread which didn't belong to me.
why, we have a long history, which began in the days qb45-dot-com was dot-com. and i have read many of your posts here as well, so yeah, i'm able to judge you well, imho.
8) oracle:
Quote:loose: we were talking about the locking in the other thread, and the fact that there is hardly any moderation going on around here... several people requested the thread to be locked but no admin came...
yes, i guess several "LOCK THIS THREAD" messages and at least one "DELETE THIS ENTIRE THREAD" were not enough. sigh.
=-=-=-=
now you see why i like tree-forums? i can reply to each post directly, instead of having to address people one by one and quote them.
YHNBT (you have not been trolled)
HAND
[Flexibal>
