Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Oracle PL/SQL
#11
******like indentations in code?******

SQL is good, but only when you don't torture students with... intricacies.

<<tortured student.
Peace cannot be obtained without war. Why? If there is already peace, it is unnecessary for war. If there is no peace, there is already war."

Visit www.neobasic.net to see rubbish in all its finest.
Reply
#12
People who hate indentions are queer.

(I was using netbeans for my code, so it was putting 8 spaces in instead of a tab... so ya, I can see why you're pissed.)
am an asshole. Get used to it.
Reply
#13
< --- likes PL/SQL.

i started this post bc i needed help writing an anonymous block but i figured it out. i couldnt do it last night. i guess i was too fatigued & plus i was drinking. =\

Aga%, alot of people feel the same way when it comes to SQL, tortured. when i took my first course all people did was complain & they refused to excel in the language.
here are 10 types of people, those that understand binary & those that dont. . .
Reply
#14
I dont understand... How is PL/SQL different from SQL? By SQL, I mean:

Code:
See below.

All of that.. How does PL/SQL differ except that it's for Oracle databases only?
i]"I know what you're thinking. Did he fire six shots or only five? Well, to tell you the truth, in all this excitement, I've kinda lost track myself. But being as this is a .44 Magnum ... you've got to ask yourself one question: 'Do I feel lucky?' Well, do ya punk?"[/i] - Dirty Harry
Reply
#15
very small differences:

Code:
SELECT column(s) FROM table(s) WHERE condition ORDER BY column(s);
INSERT INTO table VALUES (definitions) WHERE condition;
DELETE column(s) FROM table WHERE conditions;

LIMIT is not a PL/SQL reserved word. if it is i havent come across it yet. . .
here are 10 types of people, those that understand binary & those that dont. . .
Reply
#16
Actually, that's proper SQL syntax. I made some mistakes, and you can use multiple columns with commands as well.

Then yeah, SQL is great. I really see no difference between them.
i]"I know what you're thinking. Did he fire six shots or only five? Well, to tell you the truth, in all this excitement, I've kinda lost track myself. But being as this is a .44 Magnum ... you've got to ask yourself one question: 'Do I feel lucky?' Well, do ya punk?"[/i] - Dirty Harry
Reply
#17
yea, i like SQL. people still say there are small differences. even though the code above is a simple, maybe as the coding gets more complicated, the differences will appear. i'll havta check on that.
here are 10 types of people, those that understand binary & those that dont. . .
Reply
#18
Perhaps they're different in HAVING, GROUP BY, ASC, DESC, and other functions like COUNT(*), MAX(*), MIN(*), AVG(*), etc.
Reply
#19
Quote:Perhaps they're different in HAVING, GROUP BY, ASC, DESC, and other functions like COUNT(*), MAX(*), MIN(*), AVG(*), etc.

Yeah, i think so, too. But in the basic all those dialects are the same

You can compare it with Basic...there are QBasic, GWBasic, PowerBasic. They are all based on Basic, but have some little (or less little) differences.
B 4 EVER
Reply
#20
right.
here are 10 types of people, those that understand binary & those that dont. . .
Reply


Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)