qbcmx compiling slower than compiling from qb.exe

[barok]

i noticed it when i first compiled from qbcmx... the fps was in the high 60's. then i recompiled in qb.exe, and i got high 80's. i really don't know if anyone else found this, but i thought i would put it up, as i found this interesting.

[Plasma]

eh...? Can you post your code?

[KiZ]

uh... whats Qbcmx?

[Zack]

I really doubt it could be the almighty QBCMX's problem.

QBCMX rocks!

Dark: http://phatcode.net/other/qb4med.zip
Download it, install MED into c:\med\, run the QBCMX installer, press ESC during the search, and type in "c:\med\", and press ENTER. Then read the QBCMX docs. Enjoy.

[Neo]

QBCMX doesn't exist.


.
.
.



It's QBMCX: QB MetaCommand Extender.

AND: QBMCX uses QB's own BC and LINK to generate EXEs, so it won't be QBMCX that slows down your program. (Unless you've applied one metacommand that slows down your program)