Poll: Which OS is the Best?
You do not have permission to vote in this poll.
Windows 9x, 2000, Me, XP, 3.11 (eeeeww!)
100.00%
24 100.00%
Linux (Red hat, whatever you prefer
0%
0 0%
Apple (any Mac OS)
0%
0 0%
Total 24 vote(s) 100%
* You voted for this item. [Show Results]

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
What's your favorite?
#31
This is a difficult question. Realistically, for what I use my PC for, there aren't as many great reasons to use Windows as there once were. I find KDE superior to explorer, I already use mplayer as my only media player, I prefer the Open Source philosophy, and the vast majority of my day is already spent in open source apps with ports to Linux.

The only reason I stay with Windows is the guaranteed compatibility. If I throw a program at windows (especially windows with coLinux Wink ), it will run. Neverwinter nights, Mechwarrior 4, any one of the hundreds of games in my library, will run without a single complaint. WineX, on the other hand, does not give that guarantee.

If wineX was better, I'd use LInux in a heartbeat. I like having a customized kernel. I like the power of installing what I want. I like the debian apt-get system. I just don't like giving up everything, and I don't have the guts to erase my drive completely and switch completely over to Linux.
Reply
#32
Quote:If wineX was better, I'd use LInux in a heartbeat. I like having a customized kernel. I like the power of installing what I want. I like the debian apt-get system. I just don't like giving up everything, and I don't have the guts to erase my drive completely and switch completely over to Linux.

Why not dual boot? You can nondestructively repartition with qtparted - you can get a live cd with it at http://www.sysresccd.org. Then you get the best of both worlds. Linux doesn't need that much space compared to XP - you usually use no more than 15gb unless you are doing some serious video editing.
Reply
#33
15GB? Holy shit! Windows XP only takes up 380MB! I thought Linux was supposed to be streamlined?! :lol:
I'd knock on wood, but my desk is particle board.
Reply
#34
Windows XP doesn't take 380MB, you're DREAMING. Mine's only a few months old, and it's 1.4Gb JUST for the windows directory. These live distros like knoppix are a working system loaded to the nuts with usable software in less than 700MB.

On the other hand, Linux isn't a way of life, it's an operating system kernel. Yes, the linux you can streamline to fit into a PC BIOS is small. No, the GNU toolset, X11 and a thousand little tools you can't live without are not. On the other hand, you use them in win32 as well, but you don't consider them part of the OS. Tongue
Reply
#35
A fresh Windows XP install is 380MB here. Over time, installing applications puts more and more things into the system directory but that's plain common practice. If you've got a new XP install larger than 380MB then you're doing something wrong. I find it funny that people go gaga about the "compactness" of Linux yet say that 700MB for a Linux install is "small". XP comes pretty well loaded with apps for only 380MB as well. Where's this legendary "compactness", eh? Tongue Bite me.
I'd knock on wood, but my desk is particle board.
Reply
#36
Freshly installed WinXP home edition on my lappy is ~2GB of course with Norton Security and dell's addon programs which arent much.

Mech, everyone feels at home somewhere. That "somewhere" is dependent on the person. I feel at home with Linux not with Windows/MacOS X/.... I trashed the licensed copy of Win XP on this laptop for Linux. I am not saying that Windows is bad :roll: but I just dont like it :lol:
Reply


Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)