04-01-2005, 10:52 PM
Actually TIMER returns a double, so you have a decimal part. And in 0.13 the Win32 implementation uses the Win32 high performance timer functions so it has a pretty high precision...
ngelo Mottola - EC++
starting ll again
|
04-01-2005, 10:52 PM
Actually TIMER returns a double, so you have a decimal part. And in 0.13 the Win32 implementation uses the Win32 high performance timer functions so it has a pretty high precision...
ngelo Mottola - EC++
04-02-2005, 02:52 AM
Oh, sorry! I got things confused thinking about SLEEP 1000, instead of SLEEP 1. :roll:
|
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|