Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Time line < its what its turned into...
#21
i know , i know. this id just one of those things that drills into my head. shouldn't this be the 2004'th year being as we have not completed the 2005'th year yet.
quote="whitetiger0990"]whitetiger is.. WHITE POWER!!! [/quote]
Here
Reply
#22
Quote:that person isn’t going to sit down with a piece of paper and pencil and figure: hey, the years 0-99 are actually the first century and 100-99 are blah,blah... ...

What you said right there is really dumb, if you will excuse me.

0-99 was the first set of 100 years in AD. So naturally, it is the first century.

The first person to cross the finish line in a race isnt the 0th person. They are the first. You just dont quite grasp the concept of why it is called the first century.
Reply
#23
no i really do understand,

1st cen. 2nd cen. and so on
____|___ ___|____
| 0-99 ||100-199 |

all im saying is it sounds better. but if thats the way it goes then that's just the way it goes.
quote="whitetiger0990"]whitetiger is.. WHITE POWER!!! [/quote]
Here
Reply
#24
Unfortunately in life, the best course of action is not always the one that sounds the nicest or looks the best. But when you look at it from a logical perspective, it only makles sense.
Reply


Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)