11-01-2002, 03:29 AM
well, there is a fine line between artistic nudity and pornography. for instance, michaelangelo was dipicting david in the buff, but its a very formal pose, nothing suggesting (thank god) and used to imitate an ancient greeks style. just drawing anime girls lacking any kind of covering in a happy, sexy, nonpurposeful naked scene is most definately, pornography. also, the more realistic (that is, detailed and human-like) you go nudity becomes less and less acceptable for an under-18/sensitive audience because it becomes closer and closer to a nude photograph, which, unless in a very, very blue-moon case, is forbidden.
i know spain, as well as most of the world is less conservative on the topic, but since this is an international forum it has to appeal to a broad american audience too, which includes me (i find nudity unnerving in art, and it becomes something of a turn-off, ironically).
i know spain, as well as most of the world is less conservative on the topic, but since this is an international forum it has to appeal to a broad american audience too, which includes me (i find nudity unnerving in art, and it becomes something of a turn-off, ironically).
i]"I know what you're thinking. Did he fire six shots or only five? Well, to tell you the truth, in all this excitement, I've kinda lost track myself. But being as this is a .44 Magnum ... you've got to ask yourself one question: 'Do I feel lucky?' Well, do ya punk?"[/i] - Dirty Harry