06-11-2006, 12:24 AM
Quote:I use QB religiously. Too bad I'm an athiest.
torstum Wrote:An interpreter gives you the fastest program development time, no doubt about it.Or, you can use an IDE with code-completion, some form of "intellisense" and integrated debugger.
That would also work. As long as I don't have to keep compiling, linking and deleting old compilations from the command-line, I'm satisfied. Still, if an interpreter compiles and stores the "pseudo-executable" on the RAM, and not on the disk, it should be a more elegant process. But the QuickBasic compiler version probably does the same, so there's no difference there.