Posts: 979
Threads: 27
Joined: Aug 2001
Shaddit. Tree forums are fine, as are bullitins. It's like saying apples are better than oranges when the only thing they have in common is that they're fruit.
I like tree forums because they can handle posts in an organized data. I like these because they're simple. It's really not worth caring about.
Posts: 614
Threads: 87
Joined: Aug 2001
Bah... everyone knows oranges are better then apples
(why else would I put an orange in my lunch every day?).
Posts: 838
Threads: 17
Joined: Jan 2002
Treeforums for small sites. The other kind for big sites. A tree forum would do bad here, and get overfilled quickly, while a BB at a game developers personal site would seem empty, and access to interesting stuff would take to long.
url=http://www.copy-pasta.com]CopyPasta[/url] -
FilePasta
Posts: 3,279
Threads: 170
Joined: Nov 2003
Tree forums suck. I already said it in another post here recently. Anyone who prefers a tree forum is a certified nutcase. :p
I'd knock on wood, but my desk is particle board.
Posts: 437
Threads: 32
Joined: Mar 2004
I would agree with you there abosorken!
Posts: 838
Threads: 17
Joined: Jan 2002
I didn't say I prefer tree boards. Take a look a jocke the beasts website, and you'll have to agree that a bb would be too much there...
url=http://www.copy-pasta.com]CopyPasta[/url] -
FilePasta
Posts: 437
Threads: 32
Joined: Mar 2004
Tree boards SUCK, the best thing to have I would say its a single forum board for small sites.
Posts: 838
Threads: 17
Joined: Jan 2002
That's what I just said man. Don't make my words yours...
url=http://www.copy-pasta.com]CopyPasta[/url] -
FilePasta
Posts: 437
Threads: 32
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 1,138
Threads: 211
Joined: Feb 2020
Neither type suck; as said they just have different uses, but not only functionality but personal preference