FB_Fusion WebSite v.9b

[Rattrapmax6]

Bah, hit counters suck. So do backgrounds that stay in one place. And white on black. (or white on grey on black). And too many ellipsis. =p

I can't use it! You saw my picture. and in firefox I had to enable javascript and everything.

And oh, you'd know sexy js when you saw it.

1) Yeah, I never really like that hit counter.... Plus it gives me 19 errors on W3C's validator.... I been meaning to scrap it, at least once I figure out how to make me a better one....

As for the colours, the site has changable themes, that save.. And if ones not there you like, tell me, I'll gladly add any colour style you want, and give you credits for the idea.... =) ....
http://www.xteraco.com/xtrgraphics/theme.html

2) Why do you want to disable JS anyway?

3) Okay.... what about the themes on my site (x.t.r.GRAPHICS)? That's pretty sleek imho.... =) ...

[yetifoot]

2) Why do you want to disable JS anyway?

JavaScript has been notorious in the past for allowing exploits.

yetifoot wrote:
When hovering over the links some horrible flashing, cursor changing thing occurs.

Strange, what browser are you on?

I'm using the lastest FireFox, but i now can't reproduce it, so i guess its another FF bug.

[na_th_an]

2) Why do you want to disable JS anyway?

JavaScript has been notorious in the past for allowing exploits.

Wasn't firefox like ubersecure? :wtnod2: :roll:

[Rattrapmax6]

2) Why do you want to disable JS anyway?

JavaScript has been notorious in the past for allowing exploits.

Wasn't firefox like ubersecure? :wtnod2: :roll:

haha, good point....

[yetifoot]

I don't believe FireFox is secure, plus it (memory) leaks like a sieve. Its just better than IE most of the time for *ME*. (and thats what counts)

[potato]

FAIL

[DrV]

The correct capitalization is "Firefox", and the correct abbreviation is "Fx". Nobody seems to care, though.

EDIT: http://www.mozilla.org/support/firefox/f...abbreviate

[Rattrapmax6]

FAIL

Now wasn't that easier?

I don't care tho, FB_Fusion is not ment to be a strict-serious site.. (so far) it's just an atractive interface for quick news, and a archive for new/past demos.... .... And it works.. at least for those not so paranoid by JS.. hifty:

Can there not exsist a fun/pointless site with content on it?

[yetifoot]

You did ask for comments....

I know what you mean though. My sites crap, it doesn't pass any standards, is bland and has no content. Doesn't stop me keeping it up though.

When i asked for comments on my site, i got blanked, which must be far worse, i assume no one posted, because they had nothing good to say.

@DRV: Noted. I will refrain from camelcasing it in future.

[na_th_an]

I'm trying IE7 right now, it looks good