Qbasicnews.com

Full Version: I am fed up with one liners...
You're currently viewing a stripped down version of our content. View the full version with proper formatting.
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18
I most certainly did! And I didn't use any formula - I went to Binary mode, typed in a bunch of 1's, then switched to Decimal. Bingo.
Jeez. :roll: Be solid with your case.
You could also use 2^n. Where n=no.of bits.
Yes, TBBQ, I am familiar with Binary.
Although this is beside the point - you haven't answered in response to my statement about your
Code:
:roll:  :lol:
posts.
I have said in my previous posts that I will avoid posting them.
And IMHO that should also include one-word posts, and "hahah" or "lol!!!".
...or making failed attempts to drag topics about game projects off to discussions about "why I'm moving to Linux"...
You're being paranoid. I was just commenting on what Jocke and Nath suggested. I didnt make an attempt to 'drag' the topic offtrack.
I think you're missing the point there TBBQ... when you pretty much post nothing but one liners it gets quite annoying. (Now don't get me wrong, you do post some useful stuff... but lately you really have been posting a lot of junk). Heck, I'm sure I've posted one liners too... but I don't do it nearly as often as some people around here (not just you TBBQ). Yes, some one liners are fine.. but a lot are not. Like that one post of yours with only a :lol: was the stupidest thing I had seen in a while here. We don't need that crap as I'm sure you are well aware of. Wink

To take your example of a post with "a lot of meaning behind it"... "So?" is probably one of the most useless posts ever. Better to explain why you said "So?" and offer an explanation as to why you said it and maybe offer some sort of alternative or something (something that would be helpful to the person you are "So?"ing). Personally if you replied with "So?" to something I had posted on the forum I would ignore it completely as it is so stupid and meaningless by itself.

Pay attention here:
Now, as I said before... we're going to start everyone on a "clean slate." No one is going to be favoured over anyone else (or over-watched because they have posted a lot of them in the past), but we are going to be watching the people who do (from this point on) post stupid one-liners repeatedly.

Now that's enough. You have been told what's going to happen, so accept it and get on with your posting Big Grin.
Well i said that I would stop posting smilies. Well yes I agree I general dont post just a "So?" alone. I do offer an explanation as to what I havent understood.
Quote:
Quote:But na_th doesn't think so, and nor do I Wink

Oracle you too posted a oneliner. This has some meaning to it. Surely nathan must have been terribly annoyed to find this oneliner when he opened this thread.

Umm... I said that one liners that conveyed actual information were fine. Rel said oneliners were cool. But by the very nature of this thread na_th doesn't think so, and neither do I. That's what I said. It actually meant something, unlike your :rotfl: posts.

Quote:PS: Oracle, you shouldnt have edited aga's post. As it was blatantly obvious from the previous posts that I was being targetted.

But here at QBnews there are certain rules saying that you can't target somebody directly in a thread. Aga should have used PM to confirm his suspicions, or not said it at all, because you're right, it was plainly obvious.
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18